Wolf Children (official website) is an animated feature directed by Mamoru Hosoda, released in Japan on July 21, 2012.
I still remember seeing the trailer at the cinema. Those few images and the words “wolf children” immediately made me think, “This is going to be a hard film to watch.” I liked Hosoda’s previous film, Summer Wars, and wanted to go. But I was not sure I could bear what it might put me through, so I never saw it at the cinema.
I think I finally watched it online around the time The Boy and the Beast or Mirai came out, remembering that I still had not seen it. I deeply regretted missing it on the big screen. It was a wonderful film.
Here, I want to consider several aspects of Wolf Children. What kind of film was it?
This discussion assumes you have seen the film and contains spoilers.
For a refresher on the story: Wolf Children (2012): Full Synopsis and Ending Explained
*This is a translated version. The original (Japanese) is available here.
- Ending Before the Rebellious Years
I read the ending as suggesting that parenting is essentially complete once children develop a sense of self and choose their own paths: Ame as a wolf, Yuki as a human. The story stops before their full adolescent rebellion. - Ame, Yuki, and Their Father
The siblings’ two paths reflect, in my reading, the conflict their father carried within him. His death may also relate to not having had a mentor to teach him how to use his wolf body. Ame’s near-drowning offers a possible clue. - What the Wolf-Child Premise Makes Possible
The premise gives visible form to young children’s ferocity and unpredictability. It also allows the film to explore the weight of a secret and the danger of barging into someone else’s private world. - The Butterflies
I see the butterflies outside the window when Souhei remarks on Yuki’s animal scent as an image of her transformation toward choosing human life. They may also suggest the butterfly effect: a small remark bringing about a change the speaker never intended.
On this pageContents
Wolf Children In-Depth Analysis
1. Why Does the Story End Before the Rebellious Years?
Wolf Children clearly depicts the difficulty of raising children and the importance of community. Yet the part I expected to find hardest is absent: we never see the conflict between Hana and her children once they reach their rebellious adolescent years.
Being wolf children already makes theirs a difficult story. Perhaps adding adolescent conflict would have made it too painful to watch. The running time may also have prevented the film from going that far.
Personally, though, I think stopping there gives the film a powerful message. We might read Wolf Children as saying, “By the time a child becomes rebellious, the essential work of parenting is already done.”
Many parents struggle with their children’s rebellious years. But if we consider what that rebellion means, it can indicate that a sense of self is developing and the child is beginning to follow a path of their own.
Treat them strictly as adults at that point and the problem would be solved—but modern life hardly makes that easy. Parents continue protecting someone whose independent self is emerging, and conflict follows. That is painful for a parent. They are still your dear children, after all.
Those practical difficulties remain. Yet if we consider the essence of parenting, perhaps we can call the task complete when a child says, “This is the path I am taking!” That does not mean you should throw them out of the house, of course.
Ame’s decision to live as a wolf is the most obvious example, but Yuki matters just as much. She chooses to live as a human and leaves home for a middle-school dormitory; fundamentally, she is doing the same thing as Ame. With Souhei as someone who understands her, she can finally commit to her choice and leave her mother’s home.
Through both children, then, I think the film suggests that the essential work of parenting is complete when they begin asserting their own selves.
I cannot tell whether the story stops just before adolescence by design or as a result of other constraints. Either way, I think it acquires a remarkable meaning by doing so.
2. Why Two Children? Their Father’s Life and Death
A Mirror of Their Father’s Conflict
Why do Hana and the wolf man have two children? Naturally, it gives the story greater scope, but the question is how.
My reading is that the opposition between wolf and human embodied by Ame and Yuki reflects the feelings their father carried within him.
We never learn much about their father. Yet perhaps the children’s struggles show us the kind of life he lived too.
Hana wishes she had asked him how to raise wolf children. But even a parent with the same nature would have no single correct way of living to offer. There may have been little for his family to do beyond the kind of care Hana gives. I imagine the parents in his line lived with the same uncertainties and inner conflicts.
He had the same wish as Yuki to live as a human, and so made his life in human society. But perhaps Ame’s choice—to live as a wolf—also had a strong appeal for him.
Through the two children, I think we witness three lives. Perhaps that is why the film does not need to show the father’s childhood: his children reveal it to us. This reading may also offer a way to understand the early tragedy.
Why Did Their Father Die?
Early in the story, the father dies, leaving Hana with the two young children.
Perhaps he fell into the river while hunting a bird and died because of the way he fell. But why did he fall in the first place?
There are several possibilities. One possible clue is the scene in which Ame nearly drowns in the river.
Ame also has an accident while trying to catch a bird. The scene feels as though the filmmakers are calling out, “Remember the father!” It seems to invite us to read a connection.
Perhaps they fell for the same reason. Ame has not yet learned how to use his body as a wolf: he steps on his scarf and falls. The Ame we see at the end probably would not make that mistake.
Might the father have been in the same position? He was an adult wolf, but did not spend all his time in that form. He lived mostly as a human—though perhaps he occasionally ran in the mountains. He may not have been particularly skilled at moving as a wolf either.
When he brings a bird to Hana during her pregnancy with Yuki, he looks less like an expert hunter than someone saying, “I gave it a try, and hey, look what I caught!”
Had he learned to live as a wolf from childhood and become fully at ease with his body—had he found someone like Ame’s Teacher, the elderly fox—perhaps the tragedy would not have happened.
If so, losing his parents when he was young may have been part of what led to his death.
In this reading, the tragedy grows out of his whole life as someone obliged to exist between the two worlds.
That makes Ame’s meeting with Teacher an enormous blessing.
3. What the Wolf-Child Premise Does: The Secrets People Carry
Now I want to change the angle and consider what being wolf children makes possible in the film.
For one thing, the wolf forms give vivid expression to young children’s ferocity and unpredictability.
But the scene in which Yuki injures Souhei suggests another purpose too.
Afraid that Souhei will discover the truth about her, Yuki tries to keep her distance. He presses her for an explanation instead.
The specific secret is that Yuki is a wolf child. More broadly, though, I think the scene concerns a secret someone carries within them.
Children in particular may follow their curiosity without considering whether someone wants a subject brought up. With or without bad intentions, stomping across those boundaries in muddy boots is a serious violation—one that can provoke fierce retaliation. That, I think, is what the scene is telling us.
Yet this particular premise also lets us sympathize with Souhei. Being a wolf child is far beyond any secret we would ordinarily imagine. Living on the assumption that other people might be wolves would itself seem rather odd.
So we are allowed not to blame him. His actions afterward matter a great deal too, of course.
In short, the wolf-child premise:
- Gives direct expression to children’s ferocity and unpredictability.
- Makes the secrets people carry visible.
- Creates drama when someone approaches such a secret.
- Even allows sympathy for the person who intrudes on it.
The wolf children are a wonderful dramatic device, and I think the film makes full use of them.
4. The Butterflies: Yuki’s Change and the Butterfly Effect
Finally, I want to consider the butterflies outside the window when Souhei says Yuki smells like an animal.
It is a small detail, but animation contains nothing that has not been drawn. That makes me think the filmmakers had a reason to want butterflies in that scene.
One reading is that the butterflies symbolize transformation, metamorphosis, or evolution.
The scene is an important turning point in Yuki’s decision to live as a human. Had Ame been told he smelled like an animal, he might not have worried so much. His response might simply have been, “So what?”
Yuki, however, desperately does not want to be found out. Paradoxically, the strength of that fear may bring her to realize, “Ah, I really do want to live as a human.”
I see the butterflies as a way of marking that moment of change.
There is another possible reading: perhaps they also suggest the butterfly effect.
Here, the “butterfly effect” means something small leading to an unexpected result. The small thing is Souhei simply thinking that Yuki smells like an animal.
He does not imagine the secret behind that scent, much less intend to make Yuki decide the course of her life. Yet his remark produces a result quite different from what he meant. In that sense, it is a butterfly effect.
In my reading, then, the butterflies may:
- Symbolize transformation, marking the scene as a turning point in Yuki’s choice.
- Suggest the butterfly effect: a small thing bringing about that transformation.
We would need to ask the filmmakers to know their actual intention. Still, this is how the scene looks to me.
The scene opens a possible future in which Yuki lives as a human. But telling someone they smell like an animal is rude, and for an elementary-school child it could be deeply hurtful.
Yuki stops attending school after physically injuring Souhei. In real life, though, a child might be unable to go simply because the remark itself had hurt them.
The speaker might say, “I only said what I thought. I did not mean to hurt anyone.” That is the negative side of this butterfly effect. I think the film also reminds us to use words carefully.
Those are my thoughts, for now, on Wolf Children.
What kind of film was it for you?
Reader Comments
Have a thought or interpretation? Leave a comment